Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 37
Filtrar
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(38): e27245, 2021 Sep 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34559126

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: When developing a new medical device, it is essential to assess the usability of such a device through various stakeholders.This study assessed the usability of pain medical devices through a Delphi survey administered to physiatrists and physiotherapists.A Delphi survey was conducted on the problems and improvements in hardware and software for a panel consisting of 10 physiatrists and 10 physiotherapists. A total of 3 rounds of surveys were conducted, and the third round of survey was confirmed through a Likert scale (1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree).The 2 groups generally had a common perception of the problems and improvements in pain medical devices. However, the physiatrist group mostly identified problems such as linking patient information, whereas the physiotherapist group deemed hardware problems such as device weight or connection cables as being more important (mean [standard deviation]; physiatrist, hardware 2.90 [0.93], software 2.28 [0.91] / physiotherapist, hardware 3.04 [0.84], software 3.03 [1.13]).To date, analysis has not been conducted by dividing the focus of various stakeholders using pain medical devices. The difference in view of the usability of these 2 stakeholder groups should be considered when improving the hardware or software of pain medical devices in the future. Further research is warranted to investigate other stakeholders such as patients and device developers to improve the devices.


Asunto(s)
Diseño de Equipo/normas , Manejo del Dolor/instrumentación , Diseño Centrado en el Usuario , Adulto , Técnica Delphi , Diseño de Equipo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Manejo del Dolor/tendencias , Fisiatras/tendencias , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , República de Corea , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 66(4): 491-497, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32578784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Physiotherapy services are necessary for hospitalized patients of COVID-19 as well as chronic patients. Thus, physiotherapists present an increased risk of exposure to coronavirus. This study aimed to determine the number of physiotherapists who interrupted their services because of the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the procedures adopted by the ones who are still working. METHODS: The sample comprised 619 physiotherapists who worked in Portugal, 154 (24.9%) male and 465 (75.1%) female, aged between 22 and 67 years (34.47±8.70). The measurement instrument was an on-line questionnaire applied in late March 2020 through contacts and social networks. RESULTS: 453 (73.2%) physiotherapists interrupted their work activities in person because of the pandemic and 166 (26.8%) continue to work in person. The main measures adopted by physical therapists who continue to work in person included: hand washing (21.5%), mask use (20.3%), material disinfection (19.3%) and, glove use (19.3%). Of the physiotherapists who are not working in person (n = 453), 267 (58.9%) continue to monitor their patients at a distance, and 186 (41.1%) are not monitoring the patients. The main measures used by physiotherapists to monitor their patients at a distance included: written treatment prescription (38%), making explanatory videos (26.7%), and synchronous video conference treatment (23.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed that most of the physiotherapists interrupted their face-to-face practices because of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, once they do not follow up their patients' treatment in person, most of them adapted to monitor their patients from a distance.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Fisioterapeutas/provisión & distribución , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/tendencias , Portugal , Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Práctica Profesional/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telerrehabilitación/organización & administración , Adulto Joven
3.
BMJ Open ; 10(6): e037133, 2020 06 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32499274

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore the knowledge, use, attitudes towards Evidence-based Medicine, also known as Evidence-based Practice (EBP), and perceived barriers to its dissemination among physiotherapists. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Italian Association of Physiotherapists (n=2000) were invited to participate in an online survey about EBP knowledge and use. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The survey questionnaire comprised four sections: (1) respondent characteristics; (2) knowledge of EBP principles; (3) attitude, use and perceived effectiveness of EBP; (4) perceived barriers to implementing EBP in clinical practice. RESULTS: Out of 2000 physiotherapists, 1289 participated in the survey (64.5% response rate). Overall, 90% perceived EBP as useful and necessary for their clinical practice. More than 85% stated that they were familiar with the principles of EBP, 75% reported that they were able to search online databases for relevant information and 60% reported that they were able to understand statistical analyses. However, 56% believed that patient preferences and 39% that clinical expertise are not part of the EBP model. Half stated that they understood and could explain the term 'meta-analysis' but only 17% knew what a forest plot is and just 20% correctly judged the finding of a given meta-analysis. Lack of time was reported as the main barrier to EBP. CONCLUSION: The majority of Italian physiotherapists overrated their knowledge about EBP, demonstrating a gap between perceived and actual knowledge of EBP in this population.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Italia , Fisioterapeutas/educación , Rehabilitación/educación , Rehabilitación/tendencias
4.
Phys Ther ; 100(5): 747-756, 2020 05 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32339243

RESUMEN

Beth E. Fisher, PT, PhD, FAPTA, is a physical therapist, educator, and scholar whose clinical career has been shaped by numerous observations and experiences of patients' remarkable potential to recover ideal movement capability. Currently, Dr Fisher is a Professor of Clinical Physical Therapy in the Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy at the University of Southern California. She is Director of the Neuroplasticity and Imaging Laboratory, primarily using transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate brain-behavior relationships during motor skill learning and motor control in both individuals without disabilities and individuals with neurologic disorders. Dr Fisher previously worked at Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center on the Adult Neurology and Brain Injury Services. During her years as a clinician and rehabilitation specialist, it was her greatest ambition to be a part of developing physical therapist interventions that would maximize neural and behavioral recovery in individuals with pathological conditions affecting the nervous system. Toward this goal, she has continued to consult and teach nationally and internationally on current concepts for the treatment of adults with neurological disorders. It has been her consistent clinical observation not only that patients are limited by impairments that result from their injury, but that movement abnormalities are in part the result of a patient's automatic, implicit tendency to "respond" to those impairments via compensation.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/rehabilitación , Movimiento/fisiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/rehabilitación , Plasticidad Neuronal/fisiología , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Humanos
5.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 66(4): 491-497, 2020. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, LILACS | ID: biblio-1136231

RESUMEN

SUMMARY BACKGROUND Physiotherapy services are necessary for hospitalized patients of COVID-19 as well as chronic patients. Thus, physiotherapists present an increased risk of exposure to coronavirus. This study aimed to determine the number of physiotherapists who interrupted their services because of the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the procedures adopted by the ones who are still working. METHODS The sample comprised 619 physiotherapists who worked in Portugal, 154 (24.9%) male and 465 (75.1%) female, aged between 22 and 67 years (34.47±8.70). The measurement instrument was an on-line questionnaire applied in late March 2020 through contacts and social networks. RESULTS 453 (73.2%) physiotherapists interrupted their work activities in person because of the pandemic and 166 (26.8%) continue to work in person. The main measures adopted by physical therapists who continue to work in person included: hand washing (21.5%), mask use (20.3%), material disinfection (19.3%) and, glove use (19.3%). Of the physiotherapists who are not working in person (n = 453), 267 (58.9%) continue to monitor their patients at a distance, and 186 (41.1%) are not monitoring the patients. The main measures used by physiotherapists to monitor their patients at a distance included: written treatment prescription (38%), making explanatory videos (26.7%), and synchronous video conference treatment (23.5%). CONCLUSIONS Our data revealed that most of the physiotherapists interrupted their face-to-face practices because of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, once they do not follow up their patients' treatment in person, most of them adapted to monitor their patients from a distance.


SUMMARY INTRODUÇÃO Os serviços de fisioterapia são necessários para o tratamento de pacientes hospitalizados com COVID-19 e também para pacientes crônicos. Assim, os fisioterapeutas apresentam um maior risco de exposição ao coronavírus. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar o número de fisioterapeutas que interromperam seus serviços devido à pandemia do COVID-19 e verificar os procedimentos adotados pelos fisioterapeutas que continuam trabalhando. METODOLOGIA A amostra foi constituída por 619 fisioterapeutas, que trabalhavam em Portugal, sendo 154 (24,9%) do sexo masculino e 465 (75,1%) do sexo feminino, com idades compreendidas entre os 22 e 67 anos (34,47 ± 8,70 anos). O instrumento de medida utilizado consistiu num questionário online, tendo sido aplicado em finais de março de 2020, através de contatos e redes sociais. RESULTADOS 453 (73.2%) fisioterapeutas interromperam as suas atividades laborais de forma presencial por causa da pandemia e 166 (26.8%) continuam a trabalhar presencialmente. As principais medidas adotadas pelos fisioterapeutas que continuam a trabalhar presencialmente incluíram: lavagem das mãos (21.5%), uso de máscaras (20.3%), desinfecção do material (19.3%) e uso de luvas (19.3%). Dos fisioterapeutas que não estão a trabalhar presencialmente (n=453), 267 (58.9%) continuam a acompanhar os seus pacientes à distância e 186 (41.1%) não estão a acompanhar os pacientes. As principais medidas utilizadas pelos fisioterapeutas para acompanhar os seus pacientes à distância incluíram: prescrição do tratamento por escrito (38%), realização de vídeos explicativos (26.7%) e tratamento por videoconferência de forma síncrona (23.5%). CONCLUSÕES Os dados do presente estudo revelaram que a maioria dos fisioterapeutas interromperam as suas práticas presenciais em virtude da pandemia COVID-19, no entanto, apesar de não estarem a acompanhar os seus pacientes pessoalmente, a maioria deles elaborou ferramentas para monitorar seus pacientes à distância.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/organización & administración , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Fisioterapeutas/provisión & distribución , Betacoronavirus , Portugal , Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Práctica Profesional/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/tendencias , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Telerrehabilitación/organización & administración , Persona de Mediana Edad
6.
Neurodegener Dis Manag ; 9(6): 331-346, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31686582

RESUMEN

Aim: Physical therapy and exercise are considered essential components in the management of Parkinson's disease (PD). Using our retrospective data and years of experience in assigning persons with PD to multilevel group classes we propose a two-part physical therapy decision-making tool consisting of participant and exercise program considerations. Methods: Retrospective medical record review and therapist consensus identified evaluation considerations determined to aide clinical decision making. The ability of these variables (i.e., demographics, clinical characteristics, clinical measures cut-offs) to predict the class assignment decision of PD-specialized physical therapists was evaluated using discriminant function analysis. Results: Therapist-assigned groups differed significantly on all clinical measures (p < 0.001) which provided the categorical data required for discriminant analysis. Using all variables, the discriminant function analysis predicted class assignment of the therapists with 79% agreement. Conclusion: This proposed tool provides a framework that may guide the process for increasing access to multilevel group classes.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Fisioterapeutas , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Características de la Residencia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia por Ejercicio/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Wound Manag Prev ; 65(8): 20-28, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31373567

RESUMEN

Understanding the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors among individuals seeking physical therapist services in a wound care center is important, especially if aerobic exercise or other physical activity is recommended. PURPOSE: This study assessed the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in individuals seeking physical therapist services for an integumentary disorder in an outpatient wound care center. METHODS: Using a retrospective, observational study design, records from patients who were screened upon initial evaluation by a physical therapist for cardiovascular risk according to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines were abstracted. The screening process entailed assessment of current signs and symptoms of cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease; an individual or family history of cardiovascular disease; whether the patient was considered obese; and whether the patient was a current smoker, had a sedentary lifestyle, dyslipidemia, elevated glucose, or blood pressure ⟩140/90 mm Hg. Patient demographics and wound history also were summarized and described, including wound type and duration and pain associated with the wound. Wounds then were classified by the physical therapist as either venous leg ulcers or nonvenous leg ulcers based upon the referring physician's diagnosis. Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions were calculated to assess the prevalence of individual cardiovascular risk factors, total number of cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular risk stratification, and patient disposition. Frequencies of individual cardiovascular risk factors, total number of cardiovascular risk factors, and cardiovascular risk stratification also were assessed between patients with venous leg ulcers and nonvenous leg ulcers using chi-square tests for categorical data and t tests for continuous data. The alpha level was set at P <.05. RESULTS: Among the 70 study participants (41 male, 29 female; mean age 63.5 ± 15.1 years), 38 were treated for venous leg ulcers and 32 were treated for nonvenous leg ulcers. Overall, 38 patients (54%) had a history of cardiovascular disease and 29 (41%) had current signs and symptoms of cardiovascular disease. Patients with nonvenous leg ulcers had a significantly higher frequency of having a family history of cardiovascular disease than patients with venous leg ulcers (28% vs. 8%; P = .03). According to the ACSM guidelines, 5 patients (7%) were considered low risk, 22 (31%) were moderate risk, and 43 (62%) were at high risk for experiencing a future cardiovascular event. Cardiovascular risk did not vary significantly according to wound type. CONCLUSION: The patient risk-stratification profile in this study strongly suggested physical therapists should screen for cardiovascular risk factors before prescribing aerobic exercise or other physical activity for all patients being seen for an integumentary disorder in an outpatient wound care practice.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/normas , Cicatrización de Heridas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/tendencias , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
8.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 20(1): 50, 2019 Feb 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30711002

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: At any one time, one in every five Canadians has low back pain (LBP), and LBP is one of the most common health problems in primary care. Guidelines recommend that imaging not be routinely performed in patients presenting with LBP without signs or symptoms indicating a potential pathological cause. Yet imaging rates remain high for many patients who present without such indications. Inappropriate imaging can lead to inappropriate treatments, results in worse health outcomes and causes harm from unnecessary radiation. There is a need to understand the extent of, and factors contributing to, inappropriate imaging for LBP, and to develop effective strategies that target modifiable barriers and facilitators. The primary study objectives are to determine: 1) The rate of, and factors associated with, inappropriate lumbar spine imaging (x-ray, CT scan and MRI) for people with non-specific LBP presenting to primary care clinicians in Ontario; 2) The barriers and facilitators to reduce inappropriate imaging for LBP in primary care settings. METHODS: The project will comprise an inception cohort study and a concurrent qualitative study. For the cohort study, we will recruit 175 primary care clinicians (50 each from physiotherapy and chiropractic; 75 from family medicine), and 3750 patients with a new episode of LBP who present to these clinicians. Clinicians will collect data in the clinic, and each participant will be tracked for 12 months using Ontario health administrative and self-reported data to measure diagnostic imaging use and other health outcomes. We will assess characteristics of the clinicians, patients and encounters to identify variables associated with inappropriate imaging. In the qualitative study we will conduct in-depth interviews with primary care clinicians and patients. DISCUSSION: This will be the first Canadian study to accurately document the extent of the overuse of imaging for LBP, and the first worldwide to include data from the main healthcare professions offering primary care for people with LBP. This study will provide robust information about rates of inappropriate imaging for LBP, along with factors associated with, and an understanding of, potential reasons for inappropriate imaging.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Atención Primaria de Salud/tendencias , Proyectos de Investigación , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/tendencias , Quiropráctica/tendencias , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Ontario , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Médicos de Familia/tendencias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Investigación Cualitativa
9.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 35(11): 1005-1014, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29723123

RESUMEN

The rising prevalence of long-term conditions (LTCs) is placing increasing pressures on healthcare systems. With the future prospect that more individuals will experience multiple comorbidities, LTCs are becoming a growing concern. This article aims to discuss the challenges faced by and the opportunities afforded to physiotherapists when caring for people with LTCs. It highlights the complexity of managing people with LTCs and the demands faced by physiotherapists when working within a transitioning healthcare service that necessitates cost-effective yet, sustainable care. It considers ways that interventions can be optimized to not only support individuals with LTCs to improve their quality of life, but live an existence that has meaning and purpose. It also explores health promotion strategies that could be influential in changing the future healthcare landscape, by helping to prevent the occurrence of LTCs. The wider intention is to facilitate discussion of the future role of the physiotherapy profession in LTC management, in the hope that a shared vision can be created that is inspiring and transformative. A vision that imagines a physiotherapy service that is resilient to change and contemporary in approach, which continues to evolve to support the changing needs of people with LTCs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Promoción de la Salud , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/tendencias , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Rol Profesional , Enfermedad Crónica/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Atención a la Salud/economía , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Calidad de Vida
10.
Emerg Med Australas ; 31(1): 43-57, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29664184

RESUMEN

To provide an overview of the literature that considers physiotherapists working in the ED in relation to their roles, training levels, patient profile, safety, effectiveness, efficiency, cost-effectiveness and the provision of low-value care. We performed a scoping review of the literature. Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched from their inception to December 2016 and we updated searches on PubMed in September 2017. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility. We performed a narrative synthesis of quantitative data. We included 27 studies: five randomised controlled trials (n = 1434), 12 prospective observational studies (n = 153 767), six retrospective studies (n = 9968), two survey studies (n = 61), one case report (n = 3) and one qualitative study (n = 11). Physiotherapists primarily managed patients with low urgency musculoskeletal conditions. Physiotherapists appeared to have similar clinical effectiveness and costs compared to other health providers (four randomised controlled trials). Physiotherapists were associated with increased efficiency (eight observational studies) and reduced low-value care (one observational study). Three observational studies reported very low adverse event rates. However, none of the studies followed participants to measure adverse events that became apparent after the ED visit, nor did they consider unsafe discharge decisions or suboptimal follow-up care. The available evidence suggests that physiotherapists may be as effective as other health providers in managing low urgency musculoskeletal conditions in the ED. There is uncertainty about appropriate training and a lack of robust studies investigating the efficiency, safety and cost-effectiveness of this model of care.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Rol Profesional , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
BMC Palliat Care ; 17(1): 20, 2018 Jan 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29378566

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A growing body of studies indicate benefits of physiotherapy for patients in palliative care, for symptom relief and wellbeing. Though physiotherapists are increasingly acknowledged as important members of palliative care teams, they are still an underutilized source and not fully recognized. The aim of this study was to explore the variety of activities described by physiotherapists in addressing the needs and problems of patients and their families in specialized palliative care settings. METHODS: Using a free-listing approach, ten physiotherapists working in eight specialized palliative care settings in Sweden described as precisely and in as much detail as possible different activities in which patients and their families were included (directly or indirectly) during 10 days. The statements were entered into NVivo and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Statements containing more than one activity were categorized per activity. RESULTS: In total, 264 statements, containing 504 varied activities, were coded into seven categories: Counteracting a declining physical function; Informing, guiding and educating; Observing, assessing and evaluating; Attending to signs and symptoms; Listening, talking with and understanding; Caring for basic needs; and Organizing, planning and coordinating. In practice, however, the activities were intrinsically interwoven. The activities showed how physiotherapists aimed, through care for the body, to address patients' physical, psychological, social and existential needs, counteracting the decline in a patient's physical function and wellbeing. The activities also revealed a great variation, in relation not only to what they did, but also to their holistic and inseparable nature with regard to why, how, when, where, with whom and for whom the activities were carried out, which points towards a well-adopted person-centred palliative care approach. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides hands-on descriptions of how person-centred palliative care is integrated in physiotherapists' everyday activities. Physiotherapists in specialized palliative care help patients and families to bridge the gap between their real and ideal everyday life with the aim to maximize security, autonomy and wellbeing. The concrete examples included can be used in understanding the contribution of physiotherapists to the palliative care team and inform future research interventions and outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fisioterapeutas/normas , Investigación Cualitativa , Suecia , Recursos Humanos
15.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 34(10): 795-805, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29345522

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Goal setting, led by the patient, is promising as an effective treatment for the management of chronic low back pain (CLBP); however, little is known about current practice. The aims of the study were to explore (1) current goal setting practice in CLBP among physiotherapists; (2) perceived barriers to goal setting in CLBP; and (3) relationship between clinician's attitudes and beliefs and goal setting practice. METHOD: A cross-sectional observational survey. RESULTS: The majority of respondents used goal setting with the main aim of facilitating self-management. The greatest number of goals were set with 50% therapist/50% patient involvement. The most common perceived barriers to goal setting related to time constraints and lack of skill and confidence. A higher biomedical score for treatment orientation of the therapist was associated with a lower patient involvement score. CONCLUSION: Goal setting is common practice for CLBP and is perceived as a high priority. It is more often a collaboration between therapist and patient rather than patient-led with treatment orientation of the physiotherapist a predictor of patient involvement. Education of healthcare professionals needs to include better understanding of chronic pain to orient them away from a biomedical treatment approach, as well as to enhance skills in facilitating patient involvement in goal setting.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Atención a la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Fisioterapeutas/psicología , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/fisiopatología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/fisiopatología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Dimensión del Dolor , Planificación de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Participación del Paciente , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/tendencias , Autocuidado , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
16.
Sante Publique ; 30(6): 869-876, 2018.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30990275

RESUMEN

The authors review the most significant recent stages in developments concerning physiotherapy in France by assessing its current state. The strength of this profession is that it was reformed in 2015 under the European Agreements of the Bologna Process.With its mutations and achievements in connection with biological, medical, and clinical research progress, physiotherapy is continuing to broaden its fields of practice in order to attract future students. Nevertheless, this remains insufficient to stimulate an exercise in hospitals.Despite macro and micro-economic constraints leading to important repercussions, physiotherapists have been able to adapt to the new management of patients without altering the recognition they receive from patients.The new definition of the profession along with new training techniques should reaffirm their skills, which have not been very visible thus far.The educational reform must be considered as a starting point of a changing profession, whose fields of practice, despite constant expansion since 2016, have not yet interested the majority of professionals.


Asunto(s)
Fisioterapeutas/provisión & distribución , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/tendencias , Francia , Humanos , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/educación , Estudiantes
17.
Pediatr Phys Ther ; 30(1): 40-48, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29252836

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study investigated trends in attitudes of school physical therapists about intervention for childhood obesity. METHODS: A survey was developed to quantify attitudes. Two cases investigated the influence of attitudes on choices in treatment frequency. Factor analysis further delineated reasons for treatment frequency recommendations. RESULTS: Attitudes did not change. Variability in responses decreased. Personal characteristics had evolving influence. In 2008, the perception of the PT's role in childhood obesity intervention had a greater influence on the choice to treat, but in 2015 the perception of the seriousness had a bigger effect on that decision. DISCUSSION: Changing demographics of the therapists, increasing prevalence of obesity, and recent attention to the problem may have contributed to the trends. CONCLUSION: There is no consensus as to the role of school physical therapy with intervention for obesity, but influential variables are emerging and practice patterns are evolving.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Obesidad Infantil/rehabilitación , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Rol Profesional , Instituciones Académicas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Infantil/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores Socioeconómicos
18.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 33(6): 439-447, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28509604

RESUMEN

Contemporary and future physiotherapists are, and will be, presented with challenges different to their forebears. Yet, physiotherapy tends to remain tied to historical ways of seeing the world: these are passed down to generations of physiotherapy graduates. These historical perspectives privilege particular knowledge and skills so that students gain competency for graduation. However, contemporary practice is inherently more complex than the focus on knowledge and skills would have us believe. Professional life requires students to develop the capability to deal with uncertain and diverse futures. This paper argues that physiotherapy needs to think differently about entry-level education; the focus on knowledge and competencies that has been the mainstay in physiotherapy education must now be understood in the context of an education that embraces knowing, doing, being. Two educational frameworks are offered in support of this argument - threshold concepts and ways of thinking and practicing (WTP). Taken together, these ideas can assist physiotherapy to think in fresh ways about disciplinary learning. Threshold concepts and WTP help to understand the nature of a discipline: its behaviors, culture, discourses, and methods. By interrogating the discursive aspects of the discipline, physiotherapy educators will be better placed to provide more relevant preparation for practice.


Asunto(s)
Educación Profesional , Fisioterapeutas/educación , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/educación , Especialidad de Fisioterapia/educación , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Educación Profesional/tendencias , Predicción , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Modelos Educacionales , Fisioterapeutas/psicología , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/tendencias , Especialidad de Fisioterapia/tendencias , Pensamiento
19.
Rheumatol Int ; 37(9): 1453-1459, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28551723

RESUMEN

The objective of this study is to describe the composition of multidisciplinary teams (MDT) working within rheumatology departments across the UK. All rheumatology departments in the United Kingdom (UK) were invited to participate in a national electronic survey between February 2014 and April 2015 as a part of a national audit for the management of rheumatoid and early inflammatory arthritis commissioned by Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership. Rheumatology departments were asked to report their MDT composition; defined as a rheumatologist (consultant or specialist trainee), specialist nurse, occupational therapist physiotherapist, and podiatrist. The data were collected as Whole Time Equivalent (WTE) of each professional group at each department adjusted to 100,000 population. The data were grouped according to British Society for Rheumatology regions to study regional variations. The survey was completed by 164/167 departments (98% response rate). All departments reported an MDT comprising a rheumatologist (consultant or specialist trainee) and almost all included a specialist nurse but only 28 (17%) of the departments had MDTs comprising all the professional groups. There was a high degree of regional variation in the provision of Allied Health Professionals (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and podiatrists) in the UK. MDT care is recommended for the management of inflammatory arthritis, but few UK rheumatology departments have a full complement of healthcare professionals within their MDT. There is a high degree of regional variation in the composition and staffing levels of the rheumatology MDT across the UK; the impact of which warrants further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Departamentos de Hospitales/tendencias , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Enfermedades Reumáticas/terapia , Reumatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Auditoría Médica , Enfermeras Especialistas/tendencias , Terapeutas Ocupacionales/tendencias , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Podiatría/tendencias , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/fisiopatología , Reumatólogos/educación , Reumatólogos/tendencias , Reino Unido , Recursos Humanos
20.
Clin Rehabil ; 31(7): 978-991, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27440807

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore respiratory physiotherapists' views and experiences of using goal-setting with people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in rehabilitation settings. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 17 respiratory physiotherapists with ⩾12 months current or previous experience of working with patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a non-acute setting. Participants were diverse in relation to age (25-49 years), sex (13 women), experience (Agenda for Change bands 6-8) and geographic location. METHOD: Data were collected via face-to-face qualitative in-depth interviews (40-70 minutes) using a semi-structured interview guide. Interview locations were selected by participants (included participants' homes, public places and University). Interviews followed an interview guide, were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. DATA ANALYSIS: Data were analysed using thematic analysis; constant comparison was made within and between accounts, and negative case analysis was used. RESULTS: Three themes emerged through the process of analysis: (1) 'Explaining goal-setting'; (2) 'Working with goals'; and (3) 'Influences on collaborative goal-setting'. Goal-setting practices among respiratory physiotherapists varied considerably. Collaborative goal-setting was described as challenging and was sometimes driven by service need rather than patient values. Lack of training in collaborative goal-setting at both undergraduate and postgraduate level was also seen as an issue. CONCLUSION: Respiratory physiotherapists reflected uncertainties around the use of goal-setting in their practice, and conflict between patients' goals and organisational demands. This work highlights a need for wider discussion to clarify the purpose and implementation of goal-setting in respiratory rehabilitation.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Fisioterapeutas/normas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/rehabilitación , Terapia Respiratoria/normas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Pronóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Investigación Cualitativa , Terapia Respiratoria/tendencias , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...